Dementia In India, 2015: An Infographic

Information on current dementia prevalence in India and future estimates are published in various national and international reports and papers, as are discussions on the problems faced and possible actions. However, most such reports are long and dense, and reaching the relevant sections is not easy. As part of my content creation work, I have put together some salient points from across these in the form of an infographic that is quick and easy to read.

The infographic is uploaded on Slideshare and can be viewed in the player below (or directly on Slideshare at this link).

The slideshare link as well as the player above include options to share the infographic.

You can also view the full infographic on the Dementia Care Notes site at Dementia in India: An overview. The page includes various ways to share the infographic or include the code on your site.

If you like this post, please Share/ like this post using the buttons below.

You can also follow this blog by getting email notifications; click the “Follow me” option at the bottom of the right sidebar. Thank you!

On wrongly assuming memory loss and old age are integral to dementia, and on missed diagnosis

Around this time last year, I was in touch with a caregiver who was trying to cope with a father’s fronto-temporal dementia. In addition to watching his decline, this caregiver was also struggling with regret and frustration; the diagnosis had been delayed because senior specialists missed it, and the family had wasted several months in bewilderment and emotional flux wondering why the father had changed so much. If they had known the diagnosis earlier, they would have been able to accept and support the father’s situation better.

Over the year since this incident, I’ve been especially alert about such cases. (This caregiver’s case, incidentally, was not an isolated case, and I have blogged about similar concerns earlier). Of course, there will be missed diagnosis for any disease, but the problem is when diagnoses are missed because of systemic misinformation and stereotypes, not merely by chance. The human cost of delayed/ missed diagnosis–misunderstandings, anger, sorrow, conflicts, and no idea how to support–can tear apart a family.

In my opinion, too much of the publicity around dementia centers on Alzheimer’s and memory loss, and too much of the depiction focuses on elderly patients. Many people, including doctors, therefore assume that the early symptoms of dementia must include memory loss and that dementia hits only the elderly. So when family doctors are consulted for a fifty year old with problems like personality changes, odd social behavior or inability to name familiar objects, they may look at stress, family conflicts, and psychiatric problems. They discard even a remote possibility of dementia because “there’s no memory loss.” Such missed diagnoses can be avoided if we redesign our awareness campaigns.

Experts have increased their earlier estimates of the percentage of young onset patients and of non-AD dementias like FTD (fronto-temporal dementia/ degeneration). But existing campaigns continue using phrases like “dementia is a disease of the elderly” and “dementia is memory loss.” Many people use “dementia” and “Alzheimer’s” interchangeably. Deeply ingrained habits require motivation and effort to change, and perhaps volunteers/ professionals involved haven’t yet seen the need for that effort. But the way I see it, such (inadvertent) exclusion/ profiling contributes to poorer visibility and thus in poorer diagnosis, which in turn hides the true prevalence of the ignored segments. People don’t think “exceptions” exist, so they are not alert about them, they don’t detect it/ diagnose it, and then, because the diagnosed cases are low, people feel justified in ignoring it. It looks like a vicious circle.

Take FTD (frontotemporal dementia/ degeneration), a group of dementias that impact the frontal and temporal lobes. Read the full post here

Dementia prevalence, life expectancy, population pyramids, and playing around with graphs and scattered numbers; also, some sundry thoughts

I recently chanced on a newspaper article lauding Bollywood for spreading awareness on “rare” diseases, lumping in this so-called “rare” category genuinely rare diseases like progeria with widely prevalent problems like Alzheimer’s Disease. And I thought, maybe this reporter did not know about Alzheimer’s before watching “Black”, but surely we cannot call a disease rare just because we may not have heard of it!

See, poor awareness about a disease/ syndrome is not the same as low prevalence. A disease may be occurring often and remaining undiagnosed, or perhaps people do not talk about the diagnosis because there is a stigma attached to it; that does not make the disease “rare”, though awareness definitely needs to be spread.

There’s a tragedy happening when a commonly prevalent disease remains undiagnosed because of poor awareness. We add to that tragedy if we call the disease rare, because to call it “rare” diminishes alertness about a disease. Most of us may read an article on a rare disease with curiosity, but assume it is exotic and only something very few get (always “others”, never we or our close ones). Labeling something rare seems (to me) counterproductive to awareness drives.

The newspaper report I mention above started me in a rather disjointed gathering of diverse data and numbers that I have not yet managed to organize mentally, but hey, this is a blog, not a paper, so here goes…

Let’s first knock off the bundling of progeria and Alzheimer’s into one group. Wikipedia’s page on progeria informs me that there are 80 cases worldwide for progeria (1 per 8 million live births). On the other hand, the WHO and ADI report of 2012 (Dementia: A Public Health Priority) estimates dementia cases worldwide as 35.6 million (35,600,000) which is 0.5% of the world population, and most of these cases are either pure Alzheimer’s or mixed dementias (that include Alzheimer’s).

Also, on what is “rare” as a disease, here are some definitions (from this site )

  • A disease or disorder is defined as rare in Europe when it affects fewer than 1 in 2000.
  • A disease or disorder is defined as rare in the USA when it affects fewer than 200,000 Americans at any given time.

I hope that finishes off my explanation of the error in using the “rare” label for dementia or Alzheimer’s.

Onwards, then, to other thoughts on numbers and stuff.

Read the full post here

Dementia is not something only “others” get: Thoughts on vascular and other types of dementia (not just Alzheimer’s)

Last week, a neighbor who had been reading my Dementia Hindi website said, “I did not know this could also be due to vascular problems” (“mujhe nahin pataa tha ki yeh naadi sambandhee bhi ho sakta hai”). Her husband has hypertension, and they are not always careful about it; she was obviously shocked at the thought that neglected blood pressure problems could be connected in any way to the sort of symptoms she had seen in my mother. Dementia, hitherto a name this neighbor could barely pronounce, had become a relevant topic now.

I’d been tense watching this neighbor read the web page (the sort of tension a parent feels when a child is onstage). She had nodded at times, frowned at times, even muttered to herself. Her detailed questions after she finished reading the page showed that she was genuinely curious and concerned. In the course of my answers I happened to mention that sometimes head injuries can cause dementia, and again I saw the info-byte hit her hard; I suspect she’ll be more particular about family members wearing helmets, too.

Her concern set me thinking.

A lot of people think dementia is something that happens to others (not to them). They do not know how close it can hit. More important, they do not know that some health or safety aspects they are currently neglecting could increase their chances of dementia.

An additional problem is the confusion between the two words, “dementia” and “Alzheimer’s”. Much of dementia awareness is woven with the word “Alzheimer’s Disease”, and many dementia support organizations work under the umbrella name of Alzheimer’s. To laypersons, these terms seem interchangeable. And because “Alzheimer’s” seems an alien name, imported and “foreign”, many people are dismissive of it, and are also dismissive of dementia.

Such erroneous interchangeability causes weird misrepresentations. For example, one newspaper may claim that India has 3.7 million dementia cases but another newspaper, based on the same expert interview, may say India had 3.7 million Alzheimer’s cases. Given that Alzheimer’s is only one of the diseases that cause dementia, common sense shows that both statements cannot be true. Yet once published, the article stands as such, uncorrected, perpetually misleading.

I’ve always been concerned about this confusion between dementia and Alzheimer’s and this submersion of dementia under the word Alzheimer’s. I have many reasons for this concern. Read the full post here